Moore in 1965 was surrounded by multichip packages, he did not need to imagine that. The MOS scaling law (Dennard) would not become the dominant factor until around 1980, since it needed CMOS to really work. NMOS, bipolar, and others disappeared because they did not scale.
Moore's law was an economic law - it says so in his own words. He just looked at it as the overall result of multiple innovations. There was no one dominant scaling effect back when he wrote it.
Intel's former CEO envisioned the chiplet as a strategy to counter TSMC's success in migrating to the next process node. Unfortunately, it did not pay off. I wonder why SiP has failed to be a better alternative to large monolithic chips or SoCs.
It is still too early. As process technology becomes more expensive, SiP with smaller chiplets composed of old and new nodes will become more cost effective
Moore in 1965 was surrounded by multichip packages, he did not need to imagine that. The MOS scaling law (Dennard) would not become the dominant factor until around 1980, since it needed CMOS to really work. NMOS, bipolar, and others disappeared because they did not scale.
Moore's law was an economic law - it says so in his own words. He just looked at it as the overall result of multiple innovations. There was no one dominant scaling effect back when he wrote it.
Intel's former CEO envisioned the chiplet as a strategy to counter TSMC's success in migrating to the next process node. Unfortunately, it did not pay off. I wonder why SiP has failed to be a better alternative to large monolithic chips or SoCs.
It is still too early. As process technology becomes more expensive, SiP with smaller chiplets composed of old and new nodes will become more cost effective
I understand. In the long run, can Intel drive SiP to regain lost glory? https://www.the-waves.org/2024/12/18/intels-lost-glory-lessons-from-rise-fall-and-revival-struggle/